Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190730
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	May 12 '20 at 03:27
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GTM-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 238 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 697 75% 597 Pts	64-Core 723 45% 723 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Lighting 93.2 Reflection 86.7 Parallax 81 76% 87 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 77.8 Splatting 76.9 72% 90.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$52 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 118 65 48 59 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 450 Write 354 Mixed 274 SusWrite 84.1 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 12.4 47% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 80.7 DQ Write 84.5 DQ Mixed 32.4 38% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 376GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 149 148 149 150 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 162 Write 80.3 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 149 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 112%
Toshiba MK3265GSX H 320GB 991 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 9GB free Firmware: GJ001Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 40 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 32.2 Write 38.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 39.9 24% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.3 82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 11.7 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	220x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	142x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	113x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $323

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16