PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
Memory | 17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140806 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | May 17 '20 at 22:12 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D5) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 63 92 74 57 32 MB/s
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
371GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 68 93 76 59 34 MB/s
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
263GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 76 62 68 65 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
BUFFALO HD-PCTU2 500GB
466GB free, PID 01c5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 20 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |