Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 130% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 150% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME B350-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191231
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 22:32
Run Duration	378 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	Memory 75.6 1-Core 134 2-Core 274 87% 161 Pts	4-Core 627 8-Core 1,205 109% 916 Pts	64-Core 2,214 137% 2,214 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 190 Reflection 199 Parallax 198 155% 196 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 188 Splatting 127 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1267 313 313 314 310 310 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	229% Outstanding	Read 2060 Write 1,239 Mixed 537 SusWrite 471 237% 1,077 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 58.7 224% 85.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,144 DQ Write 1,071 DQ Mixed 664 620% 960 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 229% Great: 236%
St5000dm 000-1FK178 5TB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 3TB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 143 144 149 138 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 114 Write 104 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 140 21% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.5 6% 3.23 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 7.2 DQ Mixed 1.7 2% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 19%
St5000dm 000-1FK178 5TB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 4.5TB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 125 120 126 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 145 Write 133 Mixed 69.1 SusWrite 126 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 13 4K Mixed 1.1 9% 4.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1.4 DQ Write 12.5 DQ Mixed 2.2 3% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 19%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 143 140 142 146 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 197 Mixed 106 SusWrite 144 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 1.1 324% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 11TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 184 192 187 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 177 Mixed 91.5 SusWrite 185 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 0.9 319% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%
WD WD120EMAZ-11BLFA0 12TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 11TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 191 192 197 196 198 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 114%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 7.5TB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 69 69 71 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 171 Write 174 Mixed 93.4 SusWrite 69.6 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.1 297% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 131 131 131 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 96.9 Write 101 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 128 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.5 172% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 70 74 74 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 113 Write 125 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 72.9 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.9 229% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 90%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2TB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 71 69 70 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 181 Write 183 Mixed 95.1 SusWrite 70.2 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1 277% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 5.5TB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 131 130 130 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 175 Write 194 Mixed 100 SusWrite 129 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1 288% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 105%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4TB free Firmware: 83.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 131 130 130 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 173 Write 170 Mixed 93.6 SusWrite 129 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1 297% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 105%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 146 Write 125 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 72.7 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 126 127 126 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 142 Write 136 Mixed 87.9 SusWrite 127 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-16GFX F4-2400C16-16GFX F4-2400C15-16GFX F4-2400C16-16GFX 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 32.1 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 30.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $92

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	976x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	389x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	491x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	303x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	277x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	154x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	151x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	88x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	258x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	128x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16