Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U 23,686 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 5.87 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 121 31% 65.5 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 314 33% 266 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.22.01 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.48% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 2.77 Parallax 4.09 2% 3.29 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 3.1 Splatting 3.3 2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.48% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Imation M.2 PCIe 512GB SSD X831B 50 User benchmarks, average bench 165% 441GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFM20E1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 445 469 345 277 278 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 360 Write 415 Mixed 330 SusWrite 369 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 8.6 38% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 262 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 190 145% 199 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 214%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 931GB free Firmware: 14244514 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 122 123 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 124 Write 36.7 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 121 59% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 206% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 22.1 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6.7 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 444 9% 444 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16