Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-J1800M-D2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-J1800M-D2P  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 00:59
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J1800
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 49.9
1-Core 21.9
2-Core 44.8
27% 38.9 Pts
4-Core 35.7
8-Core 43.2
5% 39.5 Pts
64-Core 28.5
2% 28.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.94
1% 0.96 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 81 44 42 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 101
Write 94.2
Mixed 72
SusWrite 67.4
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
27GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.5 5.8 4.8 5.7 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.7
Write 9.2
SusWrite 5.4
12% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 0.2
SC Mixed 0.5
1% 0.37 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-J1800M-D2P Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-J1800M-D2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback