HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 170
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 283
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GS
Gigabyte(1458 341A) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 0.69
Parallax 0.16
1% 0.66 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 56RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 118 107 118 111 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 356
Write 345
Mixed 306
SusWrite 137
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 31.6
121% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 172
156% 240 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 89%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
37GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 96 127 134 117 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 260
Write 150
Mixed 162
SusWrite 117
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 32.1
104% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 176
140% 196 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 87%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
386GB free
Firmware: B1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 182 212 208 185 244 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 188
Write 87.9
Mixed 78
SusWrite 210
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 7.5
28% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 90.7
48% 41 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 102%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 160GB
58GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 68
Write 32.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 68
38% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
221GB free
Firmware: A50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 103
Write 94.7
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 95.4
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57%
Great: 77%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 14 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 17.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 16.8
21% 16 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback