Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 293
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,056
98% 816 Pts
64-Core 1,595
99% 1,595 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 116
Parallax 97
84% 105 fps
MRender 98.7
Gravity 95.5
Splatting 101
81% 98.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 521 516 511 509 505 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,834
Write 1,700
Mixed 693
SusWrite 546
265% 1,193 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 57.7
232% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 811
667% 952 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 223%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
232GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 404 459 462 462 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 458
Mixed 354
SusWrite 432
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 48
171% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 251
217% 322 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
497GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 75 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 78.9
Write 75.2
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 74.7
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 102 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 100
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 102
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
107GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 59 60 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 29.3
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 58.6
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FBD Kingston KHX2666C16/16G BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FBD Kingston KHX2666C16/16G 64GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $640
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback