Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 73
2-Core 138
58% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 426
40% 331 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1425 MHz, MLim: 2055 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 69.3
40% 60.8 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 46.4
44% 54.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 151 144 137 137 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 348
Write 330
Mixed 303
SusWrite 170
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 72
DQ Mixed 45.2
36% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 129%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
83GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 59 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 62.9
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 58.4
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
455GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 89 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 60.7
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 88.2
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 72%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
114GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 117 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 77.3
Write 117
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 118
142% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.2
132% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 1R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 16% 25 191 12 60 33.1" 1707 960 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback