Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 15:02
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 817 77% 640 Pts	64-Core 1,244 77% 1,244 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	59.4% Above average	Lighting 74.3 Reflection 75.7 Parallax 65.3 61% 71.8 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 69 Splatting 71 57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 156GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 306 318 316 319 318 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 475 Mixed 390 SusWrite 330 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 46 150% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 356 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 111 295 339 280 239 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 465 Write 318 Mixed 381 SusWrite 227 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 30.6 100% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 290 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 288 212% 278 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 136GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 83 82 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 88.8 Mixed 68 SusWrite 82.1 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 71GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 91 92 93 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 70 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 92 60% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 114%
CADlink Technology 4GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 4GB free, PID 6864 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.8 3.3 4.5 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Read 25.3 Write 7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 4 11% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 68% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.M16FB 4x16GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 28.2 SC Mixed 23.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $636

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)