Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	10.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-3800 APU 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 26% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 20 2-Core 40.3 25% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 78.2 8-Core 79.6 11% 78.9 Pts	64-Core 79.2 5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 7.1 4.2 43 58 36 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.2% Very poor	Read 109 Write 66.3 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 40.5 16% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 3.8 10% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 95%
hp v210w 16GB 564 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 5607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.4 7.3 7.9 8.1 7.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	5.91% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 4 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 7.5 12% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.91% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 212 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
E2-3000 APUAMDBench 25%, 117 samples	1x

GPU
HD 8280AMDBench 1%, 1,831 samples	1x

SSD
S 700 500GBHPBench 61%, 128 samples	1x

RAM
9905469-143.A00LF Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GBKingstonBench 30%, 3 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16