Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 130 56% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 385 37% 306 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% EVGA(3842 2645) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Lighting 7.87 Reflection 7.73 Parallax 8.84 6% 8.15 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 10.5 8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Piodata PIO240S325 240GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 84 83 82 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 378 Write 386 Mixed 164 SusWrite 83.2 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 22.6 94% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 94.6 81% 122 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-048.A00LF 4x4GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.2 25% 8.83 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358