Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 133 61% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 410 41% 332 Pts	64-Core 429 26% 429 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% EVGA(3842 2645) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Lighting 8.23 Reflection 7.81 Parallax 8.97 7% 8.34 fps	MRender 8.71 Gravity 10.2 Splatting 10.7 8% 9.86 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Piodata PIO240S325 240GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 144 90 88 92 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 433 Write 357 Mixed 320 SusWrite 138 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 31.7 124% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 173 146% 211 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 74%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 923GB free Firmware: 03.00C12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 107 108 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 109 Write 101 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 106 72% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-048.A00LF 4x4GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.5% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 10.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 10.8 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358