Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 20:18
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$146
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 971
94% 773 Pts
64-Core 1,446
90% 1,446 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3777) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2040 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 79
Parallax 69.1
65% 76 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 72.4
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2300 2046 1343 1338 1348 1399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,645
Write 2,552
Mixed 1,958
SusWrite 1629
493% 2,196 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 93.7
311% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 777
DQ Mixed 999
743% 993 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 346%
Great: 410%
Amd-raid Array 4 500GB
460GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 90 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 423
Write 441
Mixed 388
SusWrite 88.2
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 26
92% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 115
91% 123 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 259%
Amd-raid Array 1 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 80 80 81 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 155
Write 155
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 78.8
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
175% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 103%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
845GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 10.5
Mixed 95
SusWrite 87.6
56% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$100
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 35.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $886
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback