Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IBM Node 1, Processor Card

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	IBM Node 1, Processor Card (all builds)
Memory	49.4 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1824 x 1036 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131128
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration	301 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E7- 4870 138 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 64.2 2-Core 128 60% 95 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 502 45% 379 Pts	64-Core 1,543 96% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6276) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 111 Parallax 101 88% 107 fps	MRender 94.5 Gravity 103 Splatting 99.8 81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 239GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 72 17 12 14 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	135% Outstanding	Read 1517 Write 1429 Mixed 1,572 SusWrite 100 258% 1,155 MB/s	4K Read 58.2 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 53.6 185% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 228 172% 231 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 167%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 499GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 287GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 387 388 386 389 390 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,544 Write 1,689 Mixed 1,634 SusWrite 381 295% 1,312 MB/s	4K Read 57.5 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 54.6 186% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 229 173% 233 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 166%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1.5TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 137% 231GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 73 80 78 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 1,479 Write 872 Mixed 1,628 SusWrite 86.1 227% 1,016 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 46.9 169% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 219 167% 226 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 158%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 165GB free Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 471 482 458 485 485 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 815 Write 584 Mixed 989 SusWrite 577 167% 741 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 48.5 150% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 458 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 416 302% 394 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 291%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown D3-62MA104SQV-999 D3-62MA104SQV-999 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 56GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1333, 1333, 1066, 1066, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1066 MHz 16384, 16384, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 6.4 19% 6.63 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM03E8 SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback