Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 760GM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '20 at 04:09
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	50%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 116 54% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 298 31% 251 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Zotac(19DA 1583) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.3% Above average	Lighting 71.5 Reflection 71.2 Parallax 74.8 58% 72.5 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 56.4 52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 150 126 145 145 136 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.5% Above average	Read 224 Write 92.9 Mixed 195 SusWrite 142 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 47.6 4K Mixed 31.1 101% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 126 98% 134 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 12GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 115 114 112 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 133 Write 109 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 111 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-036.A00LF 16GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 800, 800 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 10.4 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	121x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	63x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	46x

GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	48x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	15x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16