Asrock A55M-HVS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A55M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 09 '17 at 11:27
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 92.8
45% 70.2 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 152
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 19.4
17% 22 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 23.6
20% 25 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 135
Mixed 95.8
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.84
4K Mixed 0.53
145% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
70GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 95.2
Mixed 32.4
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.44
108% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%
Hitachi H7220AA30SUN2.0T 1029MGG1ZZ 2TB
43GB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 96.5
Mixed 35.8
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 62%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB
127GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 31.2
Mixed 20.1
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.21
51% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V01D3LF4GB26826813 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-HVS Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A55M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback