EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 12:05
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 653
65% 531 Pts
64-Core 1,522
94% 1,522 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 166
95% 124 fps
MRender 88.9
Gravity 127
Splatting 128
96% 115 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 95%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,104
Write 3,774
Mixed 3,978
883% 3952 MB/s
4K Read 302
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 216
839% 238 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 606
463% 630 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
126GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 218 217 217 217 217 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.6% Very good
Read 260
Write 249
Mixed 248
SusWrite 218
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 40.1
132% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 129%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
44GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,213
Write 1,025
Mixed 579
208% 939 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 39.6
135% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 547
424% 584 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Kingston SUV400S37240G 240GB
99GB free
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 122 120 91 81 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 351
Write 214
Mixed 242
SusWrite 104
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 27.2
92% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 105
100% 159 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 77%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
102GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 44.5
Write 45
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 55.9
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
350GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 69
SusWrite 120
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
236GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 91 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 79.8
Write 101
Mixed 54
SusWrite 88.4
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.7
233% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
509GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 118 137 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 119
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 126
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
233GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 64 64 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 64
Write 15.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 64.3
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GV7BMR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback