Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 18:06
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 812
84% 676 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37D5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 128
Parallax 147
109% 136 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 127
Splatting 103
108% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,404
Write 1,348
Mixed 1,145
290% 1,299 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 76.3
263% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 1,117
DQ Mixed 789
680% 998 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 239%
SSK 512GB
175GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 382 378 392 394 394 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 402
Write 394
Mixed 379
SusWrite 386
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 37.9
127% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 243
179% 235 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 91%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 82.5
Write 91.4
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 75.7
115% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.8
384% 3.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 0.8
393% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 78%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
314GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 122
Write 97.7
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 8.1
93% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB
209GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.7 1.7 0.1 0.1 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 69.7
Write 70.3
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 0.7
63% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 38%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
42GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 77 77 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 75.2
120% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2J1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback