Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	35.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '20 at 05:58
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 79.8 1-Core 146 2-Core 288 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 558 8-Core 850 87% 704 Pts	64-Core 1,108 68% 1,108 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.3% Above average	Lighting 66.4 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 82.9 54% 72.5 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 56.9 52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 1TB 1,702 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 253GB free Firmware: LSF042C SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 111 113 114 159 117 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 490 Write 417 Mixed 373 SusWrite 152 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 39.7 138% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 175 137% 189 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 96%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 165GB free Firmware: 411030WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 260 256 260 260 261 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 448 Mixed 362 SusWrite 280 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 89.9 4K Mixed 47.8 166% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 202 152% 205 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 111%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 71GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 350 351 351 344 299 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 448 Mixed 422 SusWrite 357 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 97.2 4K Mixed 60.3 199% 68 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 203 153% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 129%
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148 2,730 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 168GB free Firmware: SAFM01.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 446 443 445 445 441 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 448 Mixed 357 SusWrite 444 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 39.6 145% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 153 130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
SABRENT 1TB 695GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT303.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1870 933 897 809 693 904 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250 974 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4.5TB free Firmware: APGNT517 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 207 206 204 208 209 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 190 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 207 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.3 168% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 120%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 3TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 182 182 182 178 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 138 Mixed 82.4 SusWrite 180 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 57GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 16.2 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 16.2 28% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.3 150% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 M378A2K43DB1-CTD Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 48GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	MC Read 36.2 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 37.1 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 27 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 38.6 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,306x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	835x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	571x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	516x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	405x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	340x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	273x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16