Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	43.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '20 at 05:49
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 72.2 1-Core 142 2-Core 283 88% 166 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 887 90% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,075 66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 68.4 Parallax 93 54% 76 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 56.9 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 1TB 1,702 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 201GB free Firmware: LSF042C SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 148 116 128 132 116 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 492 Write 390 Mixed 353 SusWrite 169 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 39.6 138% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 177 136% 185 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 96%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 163GB free Firmware: 411030WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 260 261 263 258 256 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 485 Write 346 Mixed 270 SusWrite 266 76% 342 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 33 136% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 199 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 111%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 69GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 335 318 290 253 269 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 452 Mixed 435 SusWrite 315 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 60.1 198% 67.8 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 129%
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148 2,730 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 168GB free Firmware: SAFM01.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 443 444 445 441 444 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 453 Mixed 359 SusWrite 439 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 41.2 147% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 151 127% 186 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
SABRENT 1TB 690GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT303.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1819 896 918 888 914 736 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250 974 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4.5TB free Firmware: APGNT517 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 210 205 208 212 209 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 189 Mixed 82.4 SusWrite 208 123% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.8 226% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 120%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 3TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 180 183 183 182 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 139 Mixed 83.6 SusWrite 180 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%
Generic Card-Reader 8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 0222 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.2 5.1 4.5 5.1 5.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	4.55% Terrible	Read 18 Write 2.8 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 4.8 8% 7.52 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.55% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43DB1-CTD Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 M378A2K43DB1-CTD Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 48GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.7% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 29.7 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 29.8 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 96.4 42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $25

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,309x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	875x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	838x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	573x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $850

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16