Dell DM061

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell DM061  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0WG864
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '20 at 03:06
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 3.00GHz-$98
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 20.1
2-Core 48.1
30% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 50.8
8-Core 49.8
7% 50.3 Pts
64-Core 47.3
3% 47.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
PwrHis(1787 2291) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 1.75
1% 1.76 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.96
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 106 102 97 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 223
Write 138
Mixed 152
SusWrite 102
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 26.7
89% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 81.4
DQ Mixed 90.5
74% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
12GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 22 22 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25% Poor
Read 63.9
Write 18.5
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 23.1
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
178GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.8 13 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.19% Terrible
Read 15
Write 14.6
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 11.9
21% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.19%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
255GB free, PID ab21
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 24
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 13.3
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 51%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
610GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.11% Terrible
Read 31.9
Write 23.6
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 2.2
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HTS545016B9SA00 160GB
13GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.79% Terrible
Read 29.3
Write 24.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 12.3
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DM061 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell DM061

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback