User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardSupermicro X8DT3
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110830
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 07 '17 at 13:04
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 2, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 155
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 637
60% 496 Pts
64-Core 1,326
82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 479GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2,433
Write 2,813
Mixed 2,777
600% 2,674 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 33.8
134% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 72.5
88% 154 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 318%
Great: 316%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
572GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 114
Write 101
Mixed 98.9
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.46
111% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
External RAID 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0011
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.2% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 34.2
Mixed 33.9
44% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.56
40% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
13GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 5.98
Mixed 9.71
14% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 1.36
136% 2.72 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 6x4GB
6 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 19.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback