HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 22:54
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 173
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 365
43% 333 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 400E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 48.6
48% 54.3 fps
MRender 45.4
Gravity 51
Splatting 50.2
40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$68
594GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 396 408 416 424 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 424
Write 419
Mixed 359
SusWrite 399
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 31.9
108% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 227
180% 252 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 125%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 33.1
Write 24.9
Mixed 28.6
6% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 5.7
20% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 71%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
34GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 24
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 11.4
17% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.8
208% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 22
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 11.9
17% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
244% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 97%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 201 198 200 200 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 201
Mixed 102
SusWrite 197
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.95% Terrible
Read 31
Write 22.8
Mixed 16
SusWrite 11.2
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.95%
Great: 44%
USB3.0 1TB
293GB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 23.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 3.5
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 191%
USB3.0 240GB
8GB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
Read 31.8
Write 24.4
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 24.7
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 6.1
433% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 11.4
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback