Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '20 at 23:32
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Memory 96 1-Core 137 2-Core 268 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 536 8-Core 785 82% 660 Pts	64-Core 796 49% 796 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.1% Below average	Lighting 40.8 Reflection 48.4 Parallax 54.4 33% 47.9 fps	MRender 46.5 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 34.2 33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 874 879 882 873 872 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	313% Outstanding	Read 2,350 Write 2,375 Mixed 1,467 SusWrite 919 398% 1,778 MB/s	4K Read 69.3 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 94.6 315% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,574 DQ Write 1,350 DQ Mixed 1448 1,089% 1,457 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 313% Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 175GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 491 488 471 413 280 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 478 Mixed 430 SusWrite 439 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 62.9 214% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 360 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 EVO 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 141GB free Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 491 488 471 489 492 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 487 Mixed 432 SusWrite 487 108% 481 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 61.1 214% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 359 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 42.2 MC Write 42.5 MC Mixed 28.7 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 44.2 SC Mixed 30.8 93% 32.5 GB/s	Latency 54.1 74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	43x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	72x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	28x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	27x

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $521

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16