Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 152
2-Core 299
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 979
95% 782 Pts
64-Core 1,329
82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 118
Parallax 129
103% 124 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 124
Splatting 108
108% 137 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 374 196 178 185 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 443
Mixed 384
SusWrite 233
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 54.5
176% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
127GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,401
Write 2,297
Mixed 1,660
472% 2,119 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 84.5
283% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1,121
DQ Mixed 1,229
926% 1,244 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2413 2242 1520 1530 1545 1548 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2,604
Write 2,477
Mixed 1,871
SusWrite 1,800
491% 2,188 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 93
312% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,372
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,222
915% 1,223 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 365%
Great: 410%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$182
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 33 25 31 28 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 109
Write 44.3
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 28.5
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 83%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
467GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 101 97 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 96.7
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 99.6
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35.8
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback