Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 04:41
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,182
105% 890 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
EVGA(3842 2075) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 149
Parallax 151
125% 151 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 134
Splatting 79.9
104% 135 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 155 132 23 10 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 1,347
Mixed 999
SusWrite 186
218% 978 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 68.6
244% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 839
DQ Mixed 260
323% 562 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 174%
Great: 255%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
110GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 140
Write 120
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 102
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
117GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 100 71 91 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 86.5
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 70%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$63
95GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 144
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
24GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 169 172 172 173 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 86.8
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 168
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
133GB free
Firmware: RDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 79 81 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 52
Write 68.5
Mixed 54
SusWrite 77
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 67%
Apple HDD ST3000DM001 3TB
305GB free
Firmware: AQ52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 118 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 101
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 117
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVGB 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 04CD F4-3200C16-8GVGB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 7,151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $847
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback