PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte H110M-S2H |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180309 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 15 '20 at 00:12 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
52.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D2) 2GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 62 24 9.9 25 3.9 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
117GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 96 99 99 99 MB/s
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
86GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 114 112 112 113 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH3 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 590x |
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 459x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 459x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 558x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 394x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 240x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $425 |