Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 203 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 520 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tigo 1TB 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 923GB free (System drive) Firmware: T190517 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 192 192 193 190 174 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 347 Write 343 Mixed 316 SusWrite 189 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 29.1 105% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 254%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 48GB free Firmware: DXM06H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 191 192 193 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 353 Write 281 Mixed 254 SusWrite 189 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 31.4 104% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 132 121% 186 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x8GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	55x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16