Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 03:04
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 512
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gigabyte(1458 3551) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 37
Parallax 52.6
33% 43.2 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 50
Splatting 39.8
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 178 159 160 150 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
Volume1 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 294 291 280 290 290 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Expansion 128GB
27GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 82 51 45 25 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.4% Outstanding
Read 296
Write 271
Mixed 14
SusWrite 58.1
187% 160 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 6.5
634% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 0.3
496% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback