MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C51
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '20 at 20:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	60%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core 7,120 User benchmarks, average bench 67% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 73.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 205 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 332 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 51.2 Reflection 58.8 Parallax 71.9 42% 60.6 fps	MRender 60.5 Gravity 56.1 Splatting 44.4 43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geil R3_256GB 256GB 386 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0831B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 72 25 85 12 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 400 Write 310 Mixed 9.9 SusWrite 78.5 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.4 31% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 86%
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB 5,441 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 23GB free Firmware: SBFMB1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 128 60 15 102 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 326 Write 151 Mixed 180 SusWrite 104 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 20.7 81% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 43 DQ Write 44.9 DQ Mixed 40.4 31% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.2% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 12 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 93.7 43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	533x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	479x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	386x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	312x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	227x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	222x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	219x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	204x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	101x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16