Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory10.1 GB free of 16.0078 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130808
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 05:19
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 175
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 456
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 97.7
Reflection 109
Parallax 100
80% 102 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 98
Splatting 97
79% 96 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 354 268 241 241 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 443
Write 421
Mixed 363
SusWrite 286
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 32.6
106% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 350
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
60GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 412 411 415 419 413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 434
Mixed 368
SusWrite 408
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 33.8
111% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 353
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 124%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
85GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 827 927 931 942 934 932 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 612
Write 954
Mixed 548
SusWrite 915
172% 757 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 39.3
150% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 548
404% 535 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 150%
Great: 230%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
263GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 128 127 127 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 126
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 77%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
223GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 120 118 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67% Good
Read 116
Write 126
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 118
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-C Winbond 25X/Q Series 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 30.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9SRA/X9SRA-3 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

System: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $694
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback