Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 06:57
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 545
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1755 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 11.5
2% 5.53 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 14.9
18% 22.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 101 95 114 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 475
Write 118
Mixed 126
SusWrite 108
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 19.4
104% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 49.9
82% 165 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
WDC WD10EZEX-00ZF5A0 250GB
68GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 429 435 435 432 453 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 494
Write 450
Mixed 440
SusWrite 435
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 48.1
159% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 277
232% 335 MB/s
WD WD15EZRX-00DC0B0 1.5TB
227GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 78 81 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 59.9
Write 61.4
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 80.5
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
569GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 89 89 87 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 96.3
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 89
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
107GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 145 143 142 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 143
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback