Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '17 at 12:59
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 516
59% 459 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 380
Write 310
Mixed 308
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 21.2
94% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.1
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 24.2
29% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
259GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 77.9
74% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.47
4K Mixed 0.18
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 85%
Innostor Ext. HDD 120GB
21GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 33.3
Write 28.1
Mixed 30.4
39% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.68
4K Write 7.01
4K Mixed 4.01
396% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 9905474-019.A00LF 9905474-019.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback