Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds)
Memory	18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 02:36
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 113 2-Core 221 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 431 8-Core 416 57% 423 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 17% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB 394 User benchmarks, average bench 560% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 382 391 390 393 384 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 409 Write 300 Mixed 142 SusWrite 382 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 1.5 15% 5.67 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 18.3 DQ Mixed 8.6 9% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 867%
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 112 100 99 97 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 352 Write 207 Mixed 146 SusWrite 106 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 33.3 120% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 136 102% 137 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 122%
SiImage 4TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 58%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 00.0NS04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 126 127 126 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 120 Write 118 Mixed 90 SusWrite 126 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 236% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 83%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB 5,512 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 49GB free Firmware: 1AC01114 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 71.5 Write 65 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 74.4 46% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 64%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 293GB free Firmware: 00.0NS03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 123 124 125 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 126 Write 108 Mixed 86.1 SusWrite 124 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 223% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 170 163 164 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 94.4 Write 130 Mixed 62.6 SusWrite 169 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 211% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 12.5 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 10.2 12% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8394 991770 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 8394 991770 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 13.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 15.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	236x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	127x
Core i7-2600Intel $189Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	44x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $661

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16