Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 00:17
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 1,024
92% 775 Pts
64-Core 2,625
162% 2,625 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
EVGA(3842 2690) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 25.7
41% 36 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 29.8
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 334 339 199 257 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 329
Write 403
Mixed 326
SusWrite 305
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 31.6
123% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 190
146% 199 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
591GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 168 171 171 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 132
Mixed 85
SusWrite 171
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 112%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
926GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 193 193 193 194 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 184
Mixed 122
SusWrite 193
131% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.8
368% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 37.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 31.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $945
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback