Supermicro X8ST3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X8ST3  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8ST3
Memory13.5 GB free of 20.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090423
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 133
58% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 308
33% 262 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
MSI(1462 2382) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 15.8
18% 22.3 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 19.9
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G94M2F 1TB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 27 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 57.5
Write 37
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 30
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB
111GB free
Firmware: JP4ONA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 32 32 36 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 73
Write 54.8
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 34.4
33% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
360GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 32 33 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 29.3
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 32.6
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 39 41 43 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 43.5
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 41.9
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 38%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G89DAF 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 63 70 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 65
Write 43.2
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 65.2
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
99GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 34 31 31 33 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 39
Write 33
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 31.3
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ATMEL 26DF321 56GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8ST3 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro X8ST3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback