PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X8ST3 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X8ST3 |
Memory | 26 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131107 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 21 '21 at 18:20 |
Run Duration | 212 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 27 49 36 35 MB/s
|
30.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$33
547GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 58 60 64 59 MB/s
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
52GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 61 58 64 58 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
16GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 47 47 47 48 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
453GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 71 69 67 70 MB/s
|
37.3%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G89DAF 1TB
60GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 15 14 14 12 MB/s
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: JP4ONA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 76 75 79 76 MB/s
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
27.8%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 7x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 3x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples | 2x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |