Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 12 '21 at 06:11
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 82.4 1-Core 148 2-Core 295 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 928 92% 752 Pts	64-Core 1,390 86% 1,390 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.9% Good	Lighting 84 Reflection 96.7 Parallax 85.9 68% 88.9 fps	MRender 84.2 Gravity 87.4 Splatting 75.9 67% 82.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1795 1454 1814 1698 1657 1567 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	320% Outstanding	Read 2565 Write 2,110 Mixed 1,395 SusWrite 1,664 433% 1,934 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 70.3 230% 84.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1166 DQ Write 799 DQ Mixed 992 738% 986 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 320% Great: 393%
Kingston SE100S3100G 400GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 113GB free Firmware: 611ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 262 253 229 256 257 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.4% Good	Read 455 Write 279 Mixed 331 SusWrite 254 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 23.7 84% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 127 101% 143 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 66%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 372GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 415 414 414 415 415 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 405 Mixed 415 SusWrite 415 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 47.3 159% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 174 135% 187 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 125%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB 4,649 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 945GB free Firmware: APGNW7JH SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 112 117 120 118 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 112 Write 100 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 117 68% 93.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.2 102% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 113%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB 3,837 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 489GB free Firmware: 0302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 92 92 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 82 Write 58.2 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 90.4 52% 70.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 357GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 110 110 110 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 160 Write 138 Mixed 80.2 SusWrite 108 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 114%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 246GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 60 89 91 95 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 89.2 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 86.7 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 4x8GB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 37 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 34.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,652x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,264x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $129Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,415x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,238x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,077x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,470x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	725x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16