Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E700  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3061-A1
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110907
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 13 '17 at 19:31
Run Duration391 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$74
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 155
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 212
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
Dell(1028 2126) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500NM0011 500GB-$79
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 143
Write 141
Mixed 81.7
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.49
116% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 84%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 22.7
Mixed 17.6
28% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 20%
HUA72101 0KLA330 1TB
930GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.3% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 6.82
Mixed 10.5
16% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.51
4K Mixed 0.31
31% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 8%
ST1000DL 002-9TT153 1TB
769GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
22% Poor
Read 26.7
Write 24
Mixed 10.1
24% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 4.17
4K Mixed 0.35
156% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22%
Great: 23%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 12.2
Mixed 19
23% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.84
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.71
74% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E700 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback