Lenovo 10AHS0Q501

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10AHS0Q501  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '17 at 17:16
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 198
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 267
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 309F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4578
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 4.47
3% 4.51 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.83
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 87.7
Write 60.3
Mixed 13.1
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 0.48
110% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 88%
HUA72101 0KLA330 1TB
0GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.57% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 6.86
Mixed 9.77
15% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.32
34% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.57%
Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 11.5
Mixed 16.1
22% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.46
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.73
80% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 24%
ST1000DL 002-9TT153 1TB
0GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 29.5
Write 23.4
Mixed 26
33% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 3.65
4K Mixed 0.35
138% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 23%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
0GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 22.1
Mixed 11.1
24% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.22
65% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback