Today's hottest deals

Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP905S3G-K01IT
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Memory 12.5
1-Core 13.7
2-Core 27.9
10% 18 Pts
4-Core 43.6
8-Core 50.5
6% 47 Pts
64-Core 54.9
3% 54.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8250
Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT41K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 28 24 16 17 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 269
Write 28.5
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 22.3
21% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 9.9
40% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 93.7
DQ Write 30.2
DQ Mixed 36.4
34% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.35% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.5
4% 1.53 GB/s
Latency 381
10% 381 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback