Today's hottest deals

Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP905S3G-K02CO
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140805
Uptime16.5 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 00:33
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Memory 20.1
1-Core 13.6
2-Core 29.1
13% 20.9 Pts
4-Core 59.4
8-Core 55.9
8% 57.7 Pts
64-Core 58.5
4% 58.5 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8250
Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.1
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT41K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 78 61 57 49 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30% Poor
Read 205
Write 54.3
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 58
21% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 13.1
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 34.5
DQ Mixed 32.8
36% 62 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30%
Great: 63%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 6.1 7.1 6.8 6.1 7.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Read 17.1
Write 4
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 5.9
10% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 320
12% 320 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 905S3G/906S3G/915S3G/9305SG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback