Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F
Memory	119.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '17 at 11:57
Run Duration	351 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 2,388 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 76.9 2-Core 153 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 614 54% 460 Pts	64-Core 1,566 97% 1,566 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 114 Parallax 99.4 91% 108 fps	MRender 96.9 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 95.8 79% 96.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 699GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2553 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 673 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 608 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5948999887	54% Above average	Read 261 Write 204 Mixed 148 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 22.7 81% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 62.4 67% 112 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 462GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4629 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1295 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1067 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15507418285	53.8% Above average	Read 264 Write 204 Mixed 127 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 22.1 81% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 62.3 67% 111 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4977 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1700 (B1) Unknown 98 98 58 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 51 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1390 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12243248447	77.1% Very good	Read 489 Write 468 Mixed 384 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 18.6 75% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 61.1 66% 111 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 116%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 140059976 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1404 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 9973751 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5508 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1593 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 56 555089953 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1221 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10287 (C2) HDA temperature 33 44 55834574881 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -104857331559498 (F1) Unknown 100 253 30300361816 (F2) Unknown 100 253 205302340669	82.2% Excellent	Read 127 Write 159 Mixed 106 97% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.71 205% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 108%
WD Re 2TB-$33 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01D02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7883 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1908 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7434 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1904 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1868 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 39 (C2) HDA temperature 112 95 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.4% Good	Read 118 Write 124 Mixed 11.7 61% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 3.04 4K Mixed 0.5 156% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 83%
WDC WD50 01F9YZ-09YUWL1 5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	19.6% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 25.2 Mixed 27.1 34% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.03 4K Write 2.97 4K Mixed 0.28 122% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 72%
WDC WD40 00F9YZ-09N20L1 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 24.9 Mixed 24.3 33% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.36 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 600GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 25.4 Mixed 27.8 35% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.19 72% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A Sem... 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 36.4 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 30 96% 33.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.7 23% 7.9 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Supermicro X9DR7/E-(J)LN4F

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v21stBench 58%, 398 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	1x
M500 480GBCrucial $84Bench 83%, 9,168 samples	1x
Raid 0 Volume 912GBIntelBench 114%, 287 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	3x
HMT42GR7AFR4C 8x16GBHynixBench 98%, 29 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0-C M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K70DH0- M393B1K7... 128GBSamsungBench 87%, 9 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16