Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 95.1 45% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 141 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB 2,380 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: GH01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 24 38 48 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 9.7 Write 39.8 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 39.1 20% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.1 47% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 48%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 1GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free Firmware: 02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 2.5 3% 4.22 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 8%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB 1,223 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 102GB free, PID 2101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 22 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 20.6 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 21 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.8 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16