Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '21 at 19:16
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 192 71% 124 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 400 54% 402 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.4% Poor	Lighting 28.9 Reflection 34.5 Parallax 27.8 24% 30.4 fps	MRender 31.2 Gravity 25.6 Splatting 19.9 20% 25.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$27 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 44 19 43 45 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.2% Poor	Read 184 Write 50.4 Mixed 94.1 SusWrite 40.8 20% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 2.6 56% 16 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 44 DQ Mixed 87.8 66% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 85%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 38GB free Firmware: ZH100-47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 7.6 7.3 7 7 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 50.4 Write 6.2 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 7.1 15% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 Micron 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2733, 2733 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.2% Good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 24.5 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 20.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	817x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	783x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	746x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	772x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	447x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	414x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	347x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	183x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	259x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	196x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	145x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $418

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16