Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade Pro
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '21 at 12:54
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 588
63% 499 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6758) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6079
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 61.6
49% 64.2 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 62.1
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,279
Write 811
Mixed 644
201% 911 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 72.2
242% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 897
DQ Mixed 916
702% 953 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
314GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 79 79 81 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 47.5
Write 45.7
Mixed 49
SusWrite 77.9
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 70%
Asmt 2115 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 73 71 71 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 70
Write 68.7
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 70.4
45% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 67%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
5GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.6 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.5
9% 7.05 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 22
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.8
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback