Today's hottest deals

Asus H87-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H87-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 229
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 576
63% 500 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
EVGA(3842 2639) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 1.4
4% 4 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 58 57 53 50 50 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 399
Mixed 293
SusWrite 84.5
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 53.6
196% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 170
180% 297 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
888GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 142 143 143 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 157
Write 110
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 143
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87-PLUS Builds (Compare 884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback