Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 01:00
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,031
98% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,499
93% 1,499 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 190
Parallax 197
153% 192 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 169
Splatting 137
138% 174 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 138%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
550GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2316 2225 1362 1330 1146 1249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 3,448
Write 2,378
Mixed 2,483
SusWrite 1,605
554% 2,479 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 75.6
254% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 679
512% 684 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 345%
Great: 573%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
895GB free
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4333 4339 4335 4331 4340 4199 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
501% Outstanding
Read 3,105
Write 4,326
Mixed 3,134
SusWrite 4,313
844% 3,719 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 79.1
268% 92.1 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 664
503% 676 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 501%
Great: 573%
Amd-raid WDC WD60EFRX-68M 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 97 97 98 98 98 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.5% Very good
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 96
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 90%
Amd-raid Array 2 599GB
459GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 136 130 123 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 236
Mixed 123
SusWrite 128
131% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.6
338% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 126%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB
962GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 99 108 118 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 153
Write 140
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 109
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.7
287% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 219%
Amd-raid Array 5 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 125 123 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 99.1
Mixed 86
SusWrite 122
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 34.4
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 37.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,726
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback