Asrock H110M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 180
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 155
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 22.7
18% 21.8 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 11.7
16% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 256GB 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 7.2 33 2.3 6.7 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 460
Write 308
Mixed 307
SusWrite 38.9
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 0.4
41% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 61.9
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
11% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 175%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
202GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 162 164 166 165 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 146
Mixed 112
SusWrite 162
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
153GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 128 129 129 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 164
Write 123
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 127
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 10 12 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 21.5
Write 21.1
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 11.4
24% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.7
194% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 17%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB
30GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 1.4 1.1 0.1 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 0.9
4% 5.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback