Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170723
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '21 at 22:55
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 100 2-Core 182 65% 115 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 408 42% 337 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.5% Above average	Lighting 66.3 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 65 54% 44.7 fps	MRender 67.4 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 58.7 52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 32 31 29 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 319 Write 103 Mixed 98.9 SusWrite 32.6 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 12.8 58% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 65.7 DQ Mixed 50.3 74% 146 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 215GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 408 377 396 436 359 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 360 Write 334 Mixed 327 SusWrite 392 80% 353 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 30.6 103% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 350 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 176 175 175 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 163 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 174 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 2x8GB 1,824 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 15.6 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 10.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	132x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	132x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	90x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	142x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	101x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $742

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16